Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Naked Truth - Big Kahuna a Myth -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Investor2 who wrote (4047)	8/19/1998 2:08:00 PM
From: yard_man	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 86076

50/50 odds he will be gone before the end of his term. I know it doesn't look that way now, but wait ...

To: Investor2 who wrote (4047)	8/19/1998 2:26:00 PM
From: HH	Respond to of 86076

I2 , from what I've understood, Starr had 300 pages prior to and unrelated to Lewnski. I don't think he'll be impeached but he'll continue to be questioned here and there. HH

To: Investor2 who wrote (4047)	8/19/1998 3:16:00 PM
From: Defrocked	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 86076

Clinton and his clan have made a huge assumption that they can turn the investigation in a "political debate" not a "constitutional issue". What they have done over the last seven months however is erode their own political support at the highest elected levels in Washington, e.g Sr.Kerry, Rep. Gephardt many, many others, including his own Cabinet. The remaining Democratic leadership will not rally the party behind someone who cashed in huge political chips in the process of deceiving that political base and their constituency. Not when they think they can win hands down with Gore in two years utilizing an incumbent position. If the evidence presented by Starr is sufficiently damaging, Clinton will lose his bet on continued Partisan support IMHO. Instead of circling the wagons, Democrats may instead invite the President to their own breakfast meeting and urge him to resign. I mistrusted Nixon, just as I mistrust Clinton now. I couldn't imagine sitting across a table from the President and believing a word he says. He lied about Flowers, he lied last January, he lied this last week just seven days ago to close confidants, so why should anyone believe anything that dissembler says about anything? I'm betting he lied again last Monday night to the American people about a cover-up. And I don't think fellow Democratic congressman will stick their political necks out again for Bill.