Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (51767)	8/19/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: I Am John Galt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

The only people that can lose at ths point is current shareholders, and they have said they understand the risks. Not that they have to justify it to anybody. Allen, are you telling me that all the shareholders support what Riley and Pugs did on this thread; ie hyping a stock they may/may not have known was a complete scam? I can tell you seven that didn't! I, for one, enjoy listening to the counterpoints of Joe Master and tonto, and I have more right being here than you do. My first post on this thread was followed up with a harassment by a yeasayer. That should've been a warning flag right there for me. I even said things to support the company, and was still harassed. You don't get it, Allen. You're not exactly dealing with the cream of the crop in terms of decency. S Martin and tonto have tried to show decency and factual evidence until they were personally attacked(look back in the posts, I don't need to repeat myself. If you don't believe me, they're all there). Stuff like "Prodigal Son" makes me love coming back here. Only when I'm completely ignored do I start to come back with less frequency. When DJ Byrne comes up with rare rapier wit like last night, it prompts a response. And most of the naysayers are here to say, "I told you so" to those who have poked at them. And I, for one, don't blame them. It's human nature, and although none of the nays may admit it, I'm sure many feel the same way. I'm sure that a comment you could hear throughout the naysaying camp after the halt: "It couldn't have happened to a nicer bunch of people." Sad thing is, for every jerk shareholder in RMIL, there's a nice guy trying to make a living. But the loud ones always seem to matter more.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (51767)	8/19/1998 3:21:00 PM
From: Joe Master	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Al, You kind of read my mind. You have stated your position a number of times well enough that everybody has a good idea of your opinions too. I do not think the owners of this stock have faced reality. It is clear in their crys of conspiracy against every organization that comes into contact wih this issue. Other than a minor issue with Mork Dempsey there is absolutely no tangible proof of any short interest in this stock. They need to consider that possibly the only bad guys here are the managers themselves. In any event the onlyreaso the stock is not trading is due to the managers. None of the yeas here has that opinion. I think ifthat opinion were to become the prevalent idea then I for one and most all or most of the rest of the nays would be gone. (Because we would just be duplicating the issues brought out y the shareholders). I do not think if the shareholders had (seen the reality of the situation) they would even consider paying one cent more to invest in thi isue until the managers had been removed.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (51767)	8/19/1998 3:58:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Every other excuse, IMO, is just windbag BS. Have to disagree with you there, anyone. Very personal lies about some of us continue to be posted daily. This thread really got its origins based on lies, those lies brought additional gamblers in, and they made their investment public and open for discussion, not because they simply invested, but instead created a story, OVIS is a fundamentally strong company way undervalued and via spams all over SI invited others to hop on board this once in a lifetime squeeze and investment. Spamming was done repeatedly. Spamming caught many peoples attention and it was quickly determined that the posts about the company having great fundamentals were false. Yet, those that brought facts regarding this were quickly identified as shorters. (false, and have been advised of this repeatedly. These false accusations have been made daily ) Posting lies about individual posters is an excellent way of making sure they never ever go away. What I would like to know is what Rich_1 would do if he did not like a company. <s>