Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (20724)	8/19/1998 5:38:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 24154

Two decisions overturned in nearly as many months!!! This is awful for Judge Jackson's carrer. And how, exactly, has the legal Mind of Reg(TM) determined that it's awful for Judge Jackson's carrer(sic)? On this particular decision, Jackson seemed to be following the letter of the law, as well as its spirit, as near as I can tell. You want to explain how Bill's buddies on the appeals panel decided the law didn't mean what it says? I guess it's another one of those "judicial restraint" things, where you're restrained when you feel like it, but you rewrite the law when you don't like it. Of course, Jackson had stated he didn't particularly like this law either, but he decided he had to follow it. How unlike Bill and pals. Now the proceedings will go forward in secret, and all we'll here is the Microsoft leaks. Sort of like some other current, supposedly secret legal proceedings. Cheers, Dan.