Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (20726)	8/19/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 24154

Ah, the concise and penetrating legal Mind of Reg(TM) at work again. It's quite embarrassing having your rulings "repetitevly" overturned. Especially on some peripheral matter in the case that doesn't have much bearing on the outcome. Do you happen to have any idea how often Jackson has been overturned in the past? Tell us, oh great legal scholar,(not to mention your indisputable expertise in all other areas ), how does Jackson's literal reading of a fairly straightforward law, a reading he wasn't very enthusiastic about himself, in a matter that wasn't put forward by the DoJ in the first place, indicate some problem in his "carrer"? Maybe he thought he should just follow the law and shut up. An unpopular stance among the friends of Bill, I know. Cheers, Dan.