SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1931)8/19/1998 7:49:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
Coutesy of djane on the Ascend thread...

DSL Service: Closer Than it Appears

By SALVATORE SALAMONE

In the last month, digital subscriber line
(DSL) service deployment seems to be
getting a kick in the pants.

And the benefit to IT managers is that
they may soon have DSL service
available as an economically priced,
high-speed access technology for
telecommuters and connecting small
offices.

While the regional Bells are all rolling out
services, most of the excitement these
days is coming from the competitive
local exchange carriers (CLECs). What
has re-energized DSL in the last few
months are what has made it easier for
CLECs to deploy DSL service.

For example, some CLECs say they
now have a better working relationship
with incumbent carriers. "We've seen a
lot more cooperation from Bell Atlantic
and Pac Bell," said Ann Zeichner, vice
president of sales and marketing of
NorthPoint Communications.

Relations haven't always been cozy and
cooperative between incumbent carriers
like the Bells and competitive carriers
like NorthPoint.

While the Telecom Act of 1996 required
incumbent carriers to let CLECs
collocate equipment in central offices,
sometimes the incumbent carriers
claimed that no more space was
available.

"We were told [they] were out of space,
but space then opened up," said
Zeichner. She attributed such moves by
the incumbent carriers as tradeoffs that
would in turn permit them to enter
in-state long distance markets.

According to some industry experts the
incumbent carriers are trying to show
state regulators they should be allowed
to compete in the long distance market
because they are meeting the terms of
the Telecom Act by opening up access
to their facilities.

With such access to facilities and with
the experience gained from previous
installments, "it now takes about a dozen
business days on average for NorthPoint
to provision service in California," said
Zeichner.

That's still much faster than the multiple
weeks or even months it typically takes
carriers to provision a T1 line.

Covad Communications Co., a data-only
CLEC, has also found the going much
better in recent months. "Recent rulings
for [public utility commissions] have
helped," said Chuck McMinn, Covad's
chairman. This has allowed Covad to get
into all central offices within a region
where the company is deploying service.

The ability to offer service in an entire
region is a crucial for Covad, which is
targeting small to medium businesses
and telecommuters.

"You can serve large businesses from a
few central offices," McMinn said. "But
the key to supporting the telecommuter
market is a blanket coverage strategy.
We intend to be in every central office,"
in a region.

Internet service provider Concentric
Network Corp., which at the present time
uses DSL services from PacBell, Covad
and NorthPoint, points to other things
that are helping with DSL deployment.

When it comes to offering DSL services,
"we want the single largest DSL
footprint," said Mark Fisher, senior vice
president and general manager of
Concentric's network services division.
"We are dealing with multiple DSL
providers and multiple services."

This represents a management
challenge that becomes particularly
acute for service providers in the startup
mode.

"We interconnect with several DSL
networks and we needed something as
an interface for them to all look like one
homogeneous network to us," said
Fisher.

Concentric uses RedBack Network Inc.'s
Subscriber Management System (SMS)
product that lets a service provider take
multiple DSL services and manage them
more easily.

SMS "smoothes over the differences
between the providers," said Fisher.
This helps Concentric essentially match
a user to whatever DSL service is
available in that user's area.

And Fisher said that the RedBack
product helps in other ways, too.

For instance, he said combining the
RedBack SMS and a Remote
Authentication Dial-In User Service, "we
can take provisioning data that normally
has to be manually entered into a router
and automate the process."

The results of the changing climate and
better deployment tools is that DSL
service is quickly becoming available in
much wider areas.

For instance, this week Covad
expanded its predominantly West Coast
offerings with the announcement of DSL
service availability in New York and
Boston. And it said that it had begun to
build a network and hire senior
managers to deploy DSL service in
another 18 cities. The company plans to
have DSL service available in Atlanta,
Baltimore, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, and
Washington, D.C., by the end of 1999.

Also this month , CLEC Rhythms
NetConnections said it had completed
interconnection negotiations with
incumbent carriers that would allow
Rhythms to offer DSL service in 10
markets by the end of 1998.

And late last month, NorthPoint
announced expansion of its
predominantly West Coast DSL service
into the Boston market. The company
plans to roll out service to seven to 10
cities this year.