To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (10211 ) 8/19/1998 9:38:00 PM From: Daniel Schuh Respond to
No, Reggie, what you said is:Dan, all of that typing and you have said nothing. MSFT has set no precedent, hih? So I assume that the decision handed down by the Justice department on per processeor deals, OS bundling and online networks must simply be in my imagination. If not, what does it mean. The JD has already rendered a decision on MSFT. Their decision is an interpretation of the law, by the top cops in the country. Their decision apparently states that MSFT is currently, and has not historically been in no major violation of anti-trust policies as currently interpreted by our nations honorable adjudication system (sans the decree issued, of course). If you don't like it, fine. If you don't agree with thier decision, that is Well Dan, i said it then and I'll say it now - when has MSFT been found in a major violation of anti-trust law. this has all happened before the current DOJ crisis. Well, as for precedent, There has been action, whether purely legislative or not. Remember MSFT. Just because it did not go against MSFT does not mean that precedent has not been set. (Reggie in siliconinvestor.com I have to go now, but I will be back.
