Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mo Chips who wrote (2152)	8/19/1998 9:55:00 PM
From: j_b	Respond to of 13994

Thank you for the correction and clarification, but I reiterate, he took responsibility for a lapse in judgement, only. He isn't taking responsibility for lying, costing the public millions, dragging his supporters through the mud, making them look like fools, etc., etc., only for a lapse in judgement. Notice he doesn't say what that lapse of judgement was? By the way, what could he do to make things right? How about really apologizing. How about paying for the costs associated with his lies, the way Gingrich was made to pay the costs of the Congressional investigation when he admitted to having "made a mistake". How about..........

To: Mo Chips who wrote (2152)	8/19/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Respond to of 13994

>>"I must put it right, and I am prepared to do whatever it takes to do so." So THAT'S where Drudge got his headline about Clinton resigning, which as we all know is the only way he could really put this all right.

To: Mo Chips who wrote (2152)	8/20/1998 8:07:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Sounds like he'll do whatever it takes to make it right with his family. The rest of us can forget about it. JLA

To: Mo Chips who wrote (2152)	8/20/1998 8:54:00 AM
From: scott	Respond to of 13994

But then he goes on to blame the law......... In addition, I had real and serious concerns about an independent counsel investigation that began with private business dealings 20 years ago, dealings I might add about which an independent federal agency found no evidence of any wrongdoing by me or my wife over two years ago. The independent counsel investigation moved on to my staff and friends, then into my private life. And now the investigation itself is under investigation. This has gone on too long, cost too much and hurt too many innocent people. Yeah in one breath he takes the blame in the other he shifts it to the law. See he can have it both ways. Scott