Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LWolf who wrote (59698)	8/19/1998 11:07:00 PM
From: Patrick E.McDaniel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Laura, are you sure you didn't get a copy of "Worthless" by mistake? :o)

To: LWolf who wrote (59698)	8/19/1998 11:30:00 PM
From: mts362	Respond to of 176387

I usually use that column as a contrarian indicator.

To: LWolf who wrote (59698)	8/19/1998 11:36:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Laura, think about it. The people who write for these magazines are the people who weren't good enough for the brokerage houses. And you know what I think of those "analysts". Think about it. TTFN, CTC

To: LWolf who wrote (59698)	8/20/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: Jorge	Respond to of 176387

LWolf...Do you have an e-mail address to that Worth-less magazine...I will e-mail them a summary of DELL's Quarterly Report and tell them to get their information from someone other than the Kauffman Brothers. Regards, George

To: LWolf who wrote (59698)	8/20/1998 6:47:00 AM
From: KM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 176387

Last year, Worth Magazine devoted an entire issue to Intel, the company and the stock. After a whole lot of fluff and hoo-hah, they decreed that Intel was worth 105 per share. This was in late August or early September, I think. The issue about marked the top for Intel that year - it promptly dived into the 60's and 70's and hasn't been anywhere near 105 since. So, I wouldn't take them too seriously.