Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold Price Monitor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (16198)	8/20/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: Ahda	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116770

I am not better. I had a discussion with my son the conclusion we both came to was that this had nothing to do with ability to run office. This is not rape nor murder this is not stealing this is lust consenting adults. I can only say where in the legal system does it read we can't have oral sex. I dont think the act is illegal. Not being a student of theology I believe in Utah polygamy is accepted. Perhaps in the Clintons culture this is norm structure.

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (16198)	8/20/1998 12:02:00 PM
From: Enigma	Respond to of 116770

PK - I guess you draw the line before you get to the point of reducto ad absurdium !! However the issue is trust in this case, and I'm not sure how it is all going to play at all. From a tactical point of view Clinton's tone in his statement was a big mistake. He has lied to a lot of his close allies, a great deal of damage has been done. He would have been better advised to make his statement after a few days had elapsed - there was too much anger after the confrontation with Starr. I'm wondering if he won't now resign - but if he decides to tough it out and even face an impeachment hearing his enemies may buckle - the prospect is not pretty which ever way you look. E