SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Pueblo who wrote (115)8/19/1998 10:53:00 PM
From: Les H  Respond to of 67261
 
Actually, Clinton claims he didn't purjure because of the narrow definition. Unfortunately, he refused to provide any responses to the grand jury that would support his claim. Monica Lewinsky will provide the specific that contradict his claim.

In my opinion, he not only purjured in the deposition. He may have purjured in the grand jury deposition also. And based on his "admisssion" speech, he continues lying to the end.



To: Don Pueblo who wrote (115)8/19/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: LesX  Respond to of 67261
 
Proving that Clinton lied under oath is technical question and will be debated for years.

Proving Clinton's statements about Lewinsky as material to the Jones lawsuit is another technical question that will be debated for years.

I don't think we will have to wait that long to get resolution of the Presidency though.

LesX


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News