SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mr. Pink's Picks: selected event-driven value investments -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Pink who wrote (2122)8/20/1998 7:26:00 AM
From: valueminded  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
MP

Noticed ACRT self insured in latest 10K. But BIG DIFFERENCE the potential to underfund WC in the "retail temporary manpower" business is huge in my opinion.

If you take a look by comparison at OLSTEN, you see this is a very low margin business especially for companies which are not self insured for WC. Another big caveat is that LBOR supplies temporary construction workers which have among the highest in WC rates.

Finally, going back to Employee Solutions (ESOL) they flew high (30's/share) until it was discovered that they had underfunded their WC and consequently had stated profits a tad high. (not to be confused with ACRT's tad) Now they are down to about 1-2/share and sport a Price/Sales of <0.2 just as OLSTEN. But LBOR (undervalued as they claim to be) sports a price to sales of about 1. Seems to me this puppy has a looong way to go.

What you think ? ? ?



To: Mr. Pink who wrote (2122)8/20/1998 7:53:00 AM
From: valueminded  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18998
 
MPink

One other thing did you notice in the 10q how they replaced the cash deposits for the WC reserves with what looks to be IOU's ie irrevocable letters of credit. Now why would they do that ? ? Looks to me like it would boost cash w/o showing up as an increase in the debt loading. Or (as usual) am I reading something wrong.

thanks