SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Senior who wrote (4724)8/20/1998 2:37:00 PM
From: Michael Burry  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78625
 
People often ask me why I don't recommend or invest in medical companies. One of the reasons is that I find the field on the whole very unpredictable. Few people on this thread take any idea and buy without proper due diligence, however. And so I am going to recommend that those with the inclination for discovery take a look at Incyte. Incyte is a biotech company, and it is very hard to find or define value for such companies, largely due to incredibly negative cash flow and a reliance on a cheery future. However, Incyte is now significantly profitable with decent cash flow and low liabilities. It is a service company that sells info re: genes. IMO, this company can be to medical research and future therapies what Microsoft is to software. In other words, it has and will continue to have the info that other companies require to prosper. There are high barriers to entry in terms of technology, time, and capital requirement, and the field is narrowed down to really two significant competitors, Perkin Elmer and Incyte. Incyte IMO has the edge for the long haul. Recently, the share price has been tanking on the perception that it overpaid for a recent acquisition. Overpaying for acquisitions is often a sign of desperation, and Incyte is not desperate. I've been waiting patiently for the low 20's, and lo and behold this market correction has taken Incyte to that level. I have not bought yet, but am nearing a buy, and figured I'd throw the idea out there.

I am aware that this is no single digit PE or asset play, but with understanding of the business comes a margin of safety at the right price.

Good investing,
Mike



To: Paul Senior who wrote (4724)8/20/1998 6:51:00 PM
From: Axel Gunderson  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78625
 
And for you Bill Staton fans - make it a point to read between the lines. He will put companies onto his list (and perhaps, take them off?) retroactively. For example, check it out the next time he makes a press release about "10 year performance" of the Staton 100 Index. To be a member of that index, supposedly the 10 years of higher earnings or dividends is required. Fine - that means that all members of that index would have to have the 10 years of higher earnings or dividends prior to being included on the list. Yet he will list companies as members of that index which were not even in existence for 10 years prior to the period for which he will proclaim the 10 year track record.

Axel