SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Fox who wrote (62832)8/20/1998 2:42:00 AM
From: d[-_-]b  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff, I would take exception with this item:

5. Built in 10/100T NIC

This seems again strange. Looks like Apple wants the iMAC to sell into both the
home and office; a mistake to me. Home can't use a NIC and office does not want
a modem. I think PC makers should address each segment with different product.
(Of course Intel already knows this).


I just installed a 48 port patch panel and am wiring every room in my (under construction) house for two network drops, with four in the family room and six in my office. Of course this is a brand new house, but if you've stopped by any "Street of Dreams" home shows you'd know they almost without exception come pre-wired with 10/100 capable CAT5 in the walls.

Besides, when you can buy a 10 Meg NIC for $13.95 I really doubt it adds much to the overall price of the box. As for the USB only stuff, there are adapters to go from USB to serial or parallel.



To: Jeff Fox who wrote (62832)8/20/1998 10:26:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 186894
 
Jeff - Re: iMAC.

The USB choice is great. Dropping the standard ports, however, is a cost cutting move - it will restrict use of old peripherals - and limit some sales.

The all-in-one-no-Slots idea harkens back to the original MAC - which had to undergo continual upgrades for years as more memory was added, hard disks were added to newer models, and eventually - voila - slots were added.

It's back to the future for Apple - Deja Vu all over again.

Paul