Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BRAINTECH (BNTI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonyr11 who wrote (1488)	8/21/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: Scott H. Davis	Respond to of 2084

Parts of this is bush league. I believe I know who the individual that was sued is, and that does not surprise. I documented a clear case against that individual to the SI webmaster. And more calls to Epson may well be contraindicated, as long as it is clear that there is indead a relationship. But my experiance with SEXI indicates that some calls to a customer to verify the exact nature of the relationship are indicated. And threatening to sue an individual who calls a customer, unless the individual has crossed the border into harrassment, or a clear pattern of malicious behavior is bush, and would not stand up in court. At least in an American court (I have no background in the Canadian court system) In my Semi-clueless opinion, Scott

To: tonyr11 who wrote (1488)	8/24/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2084

To: tonyr11 who wrote (1488)	8/25/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: okey	Respond to of 2084

I think the spirit of the request to not contact BrainTechs customers is justified. The customer is not obliged to engage in conversation that has no apparent value to him/her. Especially if it is a repeated event. These people are quite removed from the share performance of a corporate vendor. Regards...Okey