SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mohan Marette who wrote (59747)8/20/1998 9:29:00 AM
From: Boplicity  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Mohan, LOL. Ibeeeee is ok, she is fun to have around isn't she..

Greg



To: Mohan Marette who wrote (59747)8/20/1998 9:57:00 AM
From: Mick Mørmøny  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 176387
 
Somebody, please help! I need to go to the Dellaholic Anonymous Money Treatment Center. I can't help myself buying more DELL shares when they go down.<g>

Indicators fell, but Garzarelli's bullish
Market strategist sees buying opportunity in further dips

By Elaine Garzarelli, CBS MarketWatch

NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- At this writing the S&P 500ÿ has corrected 10 percent, and if it is any more, a terrific buying opportunity would be at hand.

Our 14-stock market indicator composite dropped to 47 percent from 50 percent, due to the downgrade of our sentiment indicator.

Our contrary indicator, the number of bullish advisors, increased over a four-week average rate to 66 percent from 58 percent, subtracting about 3 points from the total. Stock market corrections generally occur when this index reaches 70 percent, which was a recent weekly reading.

The preliminary GDP estimate by the Bureau of Economic Analysis for the second-quarter indicated a stronger economy than most economists expected. The GM (GM) strike alone accounted for about 1 percent of lost growth. In addition, the second quarter showed large drags from net trade and inventory accumulation. The slowdown in inventory accumulation was partly due (about one-fifth) to the decline in automotive dealer stocks reflecting abundant incentives -- this decline cut 2.5 percent off GDP growth. Real GDP growth was 1.4 percent for the quarter with final sales at 3.9 percent.

We believe that Greenspan talks tough in order to calm down the surging stock market; however, he does not have enough evidence to justify raising interest rates. There continues to be signs of low inflation as the second-quarter GDP deflator rose only 1ÿ percent year-over-year. The rate of change in the CIBCR leading inflation index, which we believe Greenspan monitors closely, has declined again this month - making it seven consecutive months of decline in the rate of change (normally, five upticks in the index level have been followed by a Fed tightening).

Europe is slowing

Greenspan, in his Humphrey-Hawkins testimony, said he saw no signs that the Asian crisis is stabilizing. The area continues to be mired in a recession/depression scenario with Korean unemployment at a 32-year high. Chinese stock markets are hitting new lows, and Japanese bank stocks relative to the Nikkei are at new lows.

Europe is also feeling the affects of Asia, with the Asian contagion slowing global economic activity. Europe's slowdown is evident with German bond yields at all-time lows, UK real retail sales down -1.2 percent in June, and Spain's PPI deflated for the first time since 1986. As the same time, the European Commission wants to insure that governments reduce their budget deficits ahead of the introduction of the single currency. Although we believe the Asian situation will have a dampening affect on Europe, most of those countries should endure the situation as well as the U.S., we believe.

Yield forecast

We believe interest rates, not earnings, will be the strength of the bull market over the next year. Both top-down and bottom-up analysts are continually lowering their earnings estimates as companies report weakness (partly due to the Asian affects). We continue to look for flat S&P 500 earnings into 1999. Our bond model, however, continues to suggest yields will continue to decline based on low inflation and the budget surplus. As the budget stays in surplus, there is less need for the government to issue more debt which, of course, limits the supply of bonds and causes yields to continue to decline. This should be the fuel for the stock market's continued rise even with the flatness we anticipate in earnings.

When solving our bond model, we assumed inflation as measured by the chain weighted GDP deflator will average about 1.5 percent through the year 2000 -- currently it is running 1ÿ percent year-over-year. If we assume 1.5 percent inflation, and the budget stays near its current small surplus, a bond yield of 4 percent or such is likely by the year 2000. This in turn, of course, improves our valuation indicator for the stock market even in a flat earnings environment, suggesting an S&P 500 of 1500 (an approximate 12,000 Dow).

Sector analysis

In order for an industry to be ranked attractive, two criteria must be met. First, our outlook for the industry's earnings growth must be superior to that of the S&P 500, and second, the group's relative P/E must be below its normal range.

This month we downgraded four industries to neutral. Underlined stocks were on our favorite stock list and are no longer recommended as buys.

Aerospace/Defense -- downgraded due to slower earnings in 1998 based on the recent news of the slowdown in Boeing. This year's earnings slowdown deflates 1999 earnings and causes valuations to be high (-26 percent underperformance potential). The top 3 stocks in the group are: Boeing Company (BA, 57.3 percent of the S&P group), Lockheed Martin Corp. (LMT, 26.3 percent), and Northrop Grumman Corp. (NOC, 8.9 percent).

Household Furnishings -- downgraded due to the -10 percent decline we anticipate in 1999 (compared to flatness for the S&P 500). The stocks in the S&P group are: Maytag Corp. (MYG, 47.2 percent of the S&P group), Whirlpool (WHR, 52.8 percent)

Leisure Time Products -- downgraded also due to the -10 percent decline we anticipate in 1999. The stocks in the S&P group are: Brunswick Corp. (BC, 12.2 percent of the S&P group), Hasbro Inc. (HAS, 26ÿ percent), Mattel, Inc. (MAT, 61.8 percent).

Retail - Drugs -- downgraded due to the group's valuations - it's outperformance potential is a mere 3 percent. The top 3 stocks in the group are: Walgreen Co. (WAG, 44.3 percent), CVS Corp. (32.3 percent), and Rite Aid (RAD, 20.9 percent).

Sector highlights

The following four groups are highlighted this month. Please note the underlined stocks are our favorites in the industries.

Chemicals -- This industry is ranked unattractive because of the -30ÿ percent decline in earnings we forecast next year. Currently the group's relative P/E is at a 10 percent premium. It's normal P/E is a 5 percent discount to 5 percent premium relative to the market suggesting an underperformance potential of 4ÿ percent. The stocks in the S&P group are: The largest 5 stocks in the group are: Du Pont (EI), (DD, 59.6 percent of the group), Dow Chemical (DOW, 15.4 percent,), Air Products (APD, 6.6 percent), Praxair, Inc. (PX, 5.2 percent), and Union carbide (UK, 5.1 percent).

Hardware and Tools -- We rank this industry as unattractive. This group's relative earnings has been declining since the third quarter of 1996 and its relative price has been flat over the same period. The relative P/E normally trades at a 40 percent premium and is currently at a 131ÿ percent premium on our 26 percent earnings decline forecast for 1999. The stocks in the group are Black and Decker (BDK, 61.1 percent of the group) and Stanley Works (SWK, 38.9 percent).

Health Care Diversified -- This group continues to be on our attractive list since we forecast an 8.5 percent gain in 1999 earnings compared to flatness for the S&P 500. Because the group normally trades at a 25 percent premium, and is currently at a 13 percent premium, a 10.5 percent outperformance potential is attainable. The largest 5 stocks in the group are: Bristol-Meyers (BMY, 28.1 percent), Johnson & Johnson (JNJ, 24.4 percent), American Home Products (AHP, 16.7 percent), Abbott Labs (ABT, 15.5 percent), and Warner-Lambert (WLA, 14ÿ percent).

Hospital Supplies -- Since we expect a 6 percent gain in earnings next year (after a 36 percent gain this year), we rank this group as attractive. The group's normal P/E ranges between a 20 percent to 70 percent premium and it is currently trading at a 60 percent premium, suggesting a 6 percent outperformance potential. The largest 5 stocks in the group are Biomet, Inc. (BMET, 39ÿ percent of the group), Medtronic, Inc. (MDT, 31.7 percent), Baxter Int'l (BAX, 16ÿ percent), Boston Scientific (BSX, 14.7 percent), and Guidant Corp. (GDT, 31.7 percent).ÿ





To: Mohan Marette who wrote (59747)8/20/1998 11:38:00 AM
From: Gabriel008  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 176387
 
Mohan, briefing.com had a comparison between DELL and Compaq in their Stock Brief this morning. Unfortunately, I couldn't reproduce the graphs that were included in the analysis. The story follows below;

Dell Versus Compaq
Dell's earnings report on Tuesday was simply outstanding.

The primary credit goes to the management team for an excellent job of running the company. When you look at the numbers delivered by this team over the past years, it is hard to find anything to criticize.

To show just how well a job Dell has done over the past years, we made a comparison of Dell and Compaq, the company most similar to Dell in size and direction. There are, of course, differences in strategy between Dell and Compaq, but those choices may be the reasons for Dell's strong performance as a company.

Revenue Growth
Two years ago Compaq was nearly three times the size of Dell. With this quarter, Dell has come remarkably close to Compaq in size. When you compare the two revenue growth curves, shown below, its clear that Dell's continual upward climb is closing in on Compaq, which has lost its ability to grow every quarter.


Source: MarketGuide, Graph by Briefing.com

Most remarkable in Dell's press release was the statement that 50% of all growth in the PC marketplace was a Dell computer. It only requires a cursory look at the revenue growth shown by the other PC manufacturers to determine that is basically an accurate statement. .

Earnings Per Share Growth
Earnings per share has also been a continual uphill climb for Dell. Compaq's earnings are before any extraordinary charges.

It is important to note that you can't really make direct comparisons between raw earnings per share numbers, since all companies have different number of shares outstanding. The point of this graph is the trend of each company. Dell's is simply straight up, continually for the past two and a half years.


Source: MarketGuide, Graph by Briefing.com

Net Margin Growth
In one of the best measures of how good a management team is, Dell again shines. While the company has grown larger, the net margin has also grown. This means that not only is Dell bringing in more dollars, it keeps more of each dollar. This is the combination that every investor, Wall Street and Main Street, loves. Compaq on the other hand, has had a sharp drop in their net margins. Note that 1998 and 1999 are estimates by Value Line for both companies.


Source: Value Line, Graph by Briefing.com

Credit Goes to Strategy Decisions
Why is Dell able to deliver such good numbers?

We think it is primarily because of their intense focus on a single clear objective: direct delivery of high end PCs. Dell does not try to cover the entire market. They have completely avoided the low cost, sub-1000 PC market. While this means you don't see too many DELLs in domestic homes, it also means they don't have to build lower margin products.

In addition, DELL long ago abandoned all channels except the direct channel. DELL does not sell through retail channels and does not build inventory for resellers. Every DELL computer is built because it has been ordered. This keeps inventory incredibly low; Dell currently has inventory down to 8 days. Compaq suffered through serious inventory problems in late 1997 and early 1998 as the PC market slowed.

Dell's strategic direction in direct selling on the Internet, now at $6 million per day, or 12% of total revenue, has also been a strong playing card as it helps reduce selling costs. Dell's initiative to set up private, customized Internet ordering pages for corporate clients has a large upfront cost, but extremely low costs for repeat sales. This initiative makes it easy for a corporate departmental client to place an order directly with Dell. Once established, it should help retain the customer over time. As Internet selling grows, this should help continue Dell's upward trend in net margins.

Compaq on the other hand has pursued multiple objectives including retail distribution, value added reseller channels, and direct catalog sales. In addition, with its purchase of Digital, it will have many differing ongoing directions at the same time. It is simply harder for a management team to do multiple things. At Dell, they are very focused on a single, clear line of business. For now, that focus is paying off.

The Future for Dell
The PC market is rapidly becoming a commodity business. As the industry matures, there should eventually be fewer players, according to classic market theory. As the industry matures, the most efficient producers of commodities generally win. Dell currently has only 8% of the total worldwide PC marketplace. Even if the PC marketplace slows in growth, Dell should gain market share as a more efficient producer. In fact, if the PC marketplace shrinks, Dell's low inventory approach would give it a tremendous advantage over Compaq and most other producers.

In addition the Asian crisis is currently most likely a benefit to Dell, not a liability, as Dell consumes more from Asia in supplies then it sells as product. If Asia weakens economically, parts simply become cheaper for Dell. The net result is a gain.

The Future for Dell Stock
"Trends tend to continue." Aside from being a tautological truth, it is also usually assumed by Wall Street, until proven otherwise. Dell's stock has a built in premium over Compaq's, above and beyond the valuations based on earnings, which accounts for the assumption that Dell will continue to outpace all others in the PC marketplace.

If Dell's trend ever goes the other way, even in just one quarter's report, the premium will be taken out of the stock immediately, and the stock will probably fall, even if revenues rise and earnings increase. The rate of increase will be the item to watch. However, there currently isn't any reason to assume that Dell's strong upward growth curve will abate.

Conclusion
Like we said, it is hard to find something to criticize with Dell Computer Corporation as a business. The credit goes entirely to the management team and the efficient execution of a sound strategy. Although the stock price has a hefty premium built into it because of this, shareholders who have paid it over the past several years have been amply rewarded. As long as the Dell team keeps up the trends highlighted above, the trend of rewarding their shareholders will also likely continue.

Note: Graphs above show annual quarters. Dell's fiscal year ends in January. The latest reported quarter for Dell is Q2 of fiscal 1999, for the time period ending in July, 1998. Compaq's fiscal year ends in December. The periods are therefore not precisely comparable, but are still meaningful for the purposes of showing trends.