SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : FASC (First American Scientific Corp) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (441)8/20/1998 12:51:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 972
 
Yes, please do; we are both aware that the GPGI of a year ago and the methods they were using then bear scant resemblance to the GPGI of today. I don't know into what "mesh" GPGI is currently pounding their rocks but at least Mr. Twiford, being a scientist, should be curious to learn if a finer grind would give up more "goodies" from the leaching step. I get very nervous when I see "Not Invented Here" thinking being used; please see if he might be amenable to at least trying a sample batch run through the KDS

To all others, sorry for the slightly OT direction of this post, but there is the possibility of a customer for FASC's KDS machine under discussion.

Thanks, Ed



To: Ed Fishbaine who wrote (441)8/20/1998 1:48:00 PM
From: Lee Bush  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 972
 
Ed: I believe it has been tried already. FASC I know did process some volcanics and found that the stuff was just too hard on the chains. They had to be changed every 6 hours or so. Now GPGI ore is not that hard, but it might present a similar problem. Testing is not that easy as you would have to shut down, clean everything, process a significant amount of ore, and then clean everything afterward. I would rather see GPGI test one of the vibramills that MAXAM is using.
They could get a loaner, I understand.
Lee