SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Medinah Mining Inc. (MDHM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: the Chief who wrote (5620)8/20/1998 1:58:00 PM
From: EtTuBrute  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
I assume House just sampled, as I believe that the fun (ie drilling) will begin in the next couple of weeks. If a geologist were reputable and truly independent and had no stake in the company or the outcome of the sampling, would he not take representative samples of the target area? To maintain reputation, wouldnt he want to do this? or am I living in a fantasy land?? GG



To: the Chief who wrote (5620)8/20/1998 2:00:00 PM
From: Mike Gold  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25548
 
Chief, as you already know-the breccia has not been drilled. It is suggested that it is mineralized based on the chip samples taken from the outcropping. As you already mentioned, these samples are subject to contamination and can't be assumed to be representative on what's below. The REPORT suggests that Breccia tube is mineralized as it maybe the source for the nearby vein/mantos deposits. (Or it might be the porphyry igneous intrusive)