Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LesX who wrote (166)	8/20/1998 2:03:00 PM
From: MARK BARGER	Respond to of 67261

Les, I think we agree to disagree. But, morals are not different in different places. Well, maybe in the inner city they are. Hey, that's it! Clinton has inner city morals! Well that explains it all. Clinton looks like a great guy to hang around with, we all have friends like him. Good looking, funny, smart, just a little morally challenged. I have no big problems with him or his policies except for his slight ethics problems. Sleeping with an intern in the Oval Office and getting caught lying and covering up is just the slight problem I have with him. Have a good day all. Mark

To: LesX who wrote (166)	8/21/1998 12:15:00 AM
From: Wildstar	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Your morals in the North Carolina are different than the morals in Oregon are different from the morals in Kansas etc. Morals are in the eye of the beholder. Sadly, people's morals are situational - Clinton no exception. This situation reduces down to amorality (not immorality). Then we don't have standards for anything. I could kill someone and say, "Hey, my morals say it's okay to kill someone." And then you could go shoplift your groceries and use the same line of reasoning. And then I could cheat on my taxes or better yet, not pay any taxes because hey - my morals say it's okay.

To: LesX who wrote (166)	8/21/1998 3:26:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen	Respond to of 67261

This is not an argument over morals, its over the persecution of a famous leader by a partisan group who can't deal with that popularity. Oh I know. Who woulda thunk that Janet Reno woulda turned out to be a raving right-wing fanatic? And all those judges who are watching and ruling on every move that Starr makes. Obviously the entire Judicial Branch is nothing but a bunch of raving partisans. How dare they suggest that Billy done something wrong. Ever'un knows he's allas been a good boy. They're just jealous of his popilarity, that's it! Les, you a jeanyus. PS - I thought that when Billy Clinton fired all those US attorneys as soon as he took office that he woulda put his own boys in place. Durn that guy is a sloppy operator.