Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (24497)	8/20/1998 3:22:00 PM
From: jpmac	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

I was struggling with how to word that and there it is in a simple turn of phrase. I don't think there has often, if ever, been emphasis given in the training of any armed forces, and maybe not in the corporate or other worlds either, that there is a point where one acts according to honor rather than loyalty if the two conflict. For instance in the corporate world there was the man that blew the whistle on.. Archer-Daniel, I think it was, that was looked on by so many as a traitor and a tattle-tale rather than an honorable man. As to what honor is.. hmm.. stumped at the moment. But to the previous, depending on what is asked it is sometimes right to choose loyalty over honor. This is a very tough thing, as then you lose your honor, even though you did what you thought was honorable. That would be in something far below the likes of killing innocents, and such.