Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (196)	8/20/1998 4:42:00 PM
From: LesX	Respond to of 67261

"Generally a startup is more lucrative - but Im not sure I see your point here? Explain." The point I was trying to make is that if a world class executive's/politician motive was to make money he could do better by aspiring to become a CEO of a Fortune 1000 or Silicon Valley startup rather than running for public office. LesX

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (196)	8/20/1998 4:44:00 PM
From: Diver	Respond to of 67261

Michelle: I'm just jumping back in here after skimming a bit. 1) I would rather chat with you about ERP. Will do that a bit later. Have lots of respect for your insights. 2) Did a little research. When they were looking into Bob Packwood, the Democrats chose.......who......??? Mr. Starr because of "the non-partisan integrity he would bring to the investigation". Took a little digging to find this, but it's true. I posted over here a while back. My position is: I'm disappointed in Clinton. I do expect our CEO to answer to a higher standard. I don't expect 'em to be a choirboy. I am tired of having to wonder what he means by the words, "relationship, commitment, inappropriate, a, an, and the". Diver