Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pezz who wrote (2330)	8/20/1998 4:45:00 PM
From: MR. PANAMA (I am a PLAYER)	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

GOD BLESS AMERICA.....MR CLINTON...MT COHEN... Republicans....cut this SEX SEX SEX stuff up...US is Fighting Back at TERRORISTS and that is more important.

To: pezz who wrote (2330)	8/20/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

<<I think $100 tax on such people would be my assessment.People making $32000 Should pay some thing[more than $100].>> My momma always said that people really don't appreciate what they have if it doesn't cost them anything. Without getting mired in the details, I agree with you in concept. I still think a sales tax is more equitable (with the appropriate exceptions made for food, etc.), but everyone needs to pay something, and those who can afford to pay more should end up paying more. Hopefully the system is fair enough where they don't mind paying.