Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (2355)	8/20/1998 7:40:00 PM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

if he doesn't allege obstruction in the prior matters, much of what the Clintonistas have been saying about him will turn out to be true. Don't forget the number of indictments and convictions that came out long before the focus turned to Lewinsky. Starr and his office have uncovered and prosecuted a whale of a lot of illegal activity. And keep in mind that a lot of his costs have gone into overcoming stonewalling and deliberate and cynical delay by the WH designed purely for political advantage. For major prosecutions, Starr's cost-per-conviction record is actually pretty good. Compare his GJ with O.J. case, Boulder, Colorado (I forget the girl's name) investigation, even Watergate, which didn't get that many convictions -- Starr's has been a fairly efficient investigation.