SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LSI Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Grand Poobah who wrote (14457)8/21/1998 1:41:00 AM
From: D Peters  Respond to of 25814
 
>OT<

Mr. Grand Poobah

I'm only a lurker so my opinion really doesn't matter, but I think Shane has disappeared for other reasons. Not only has he not been posting on the LSI thread, but he hasn't done posting of any kind on SI since June 16th which is when his posting seems to have come to an abrupt halt. It appears that he has vanished from the face of the earth.

I hope something serious hasn't happened to him and that he returns to SI because I really do miss his positive input. Now more than ever I could use some positive input about LSI, especially after the slaughter most of us are enduring RIGHT NOW.

Regards,

D. Peters



To: Grand Poobah who wrote (14457)8/21/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: Jock Hutchinson  Respond to of 25814
 
For the record GP: Here is my first post to K, and her response. She has stated many times that she is the one who was called names. But once again the facts prove her wrong. My belief in my long-term LSI investment is as strong as ever:

www3.techstocks.com

www3.techstocks.com

I think it is obvious as to who is the name caller and the attacker. It is of course just as obvious that my optimism for LSI is clearly wrong in the short-term. But I am very comfortable with the compelling long-term prospects for this company.



To: Grand Poobah who wrote (14457)8/21/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Apakhabar  Respond to of 25814
 
OT from a lurker on this thread:

What is wrong with uncivility on a message board? Does entertainment count for nothing? G.P.-- have a look at "Journalism in Tennessee" by Mark Twain.

Anybody who wants a "civil" exchange of differing views or anything like that is a pussy and should be hanged.

K and Jock: Please don't stop the insults. You two don't like each other, and it only makes you argue better. K, that was an excellent blast about Jock's irrelevant family. And Jock, you clearly struck a nerve (you clever bastard).

Yes, I am a fan of Conrad Dobler. (for the serious trivia buff)