SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Paul Engel who wrote (62943)8/21/1998 1:24:00 AM
From: Bong Lewis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
i think kulat has made money everytime he down grade INTEL.
he has bought at the bottom (70/65) and sold it at 90 twice.
After selling at 90, he could have shorted at 90, then issued
the down grade. And he keeps doing that.



To: Paul Engel who wrote (62943)8/21/1998 7:03:00 AM
From: GVTucker  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
<<Kurlak completely missed the Pentium - its launch and significance as it obsoleted the 486 and Intel's competition.>>

Actually, Paul, the exact opposite is true. Kurlak had a buy for the short and long term for almost the entire Pentium cycle.

<<Then just last May (1997) , Kurlak gave a strong buy on Intel - about two weeks before Intel pre-announced and the stock dropped $15 points in a day.>>

This was just a reiteration of Kurlak's strong buy that he had for in excess of a year. And he reiterated that call after Intel pre-announced, which proved to be a correct call, as Intel went on to make an all-time high in the summer.

And when Kurlak downgraded Intel when the stock was within 5% of its all-time high last summer, he was ahead of the pack in discerning that ASP's were beginning to fall faster than units were growing. Before Kurlak's downgrade last summer, most people were estimating that Intel would earn in excess of $5 this year. The actual number will be $3, plus or minus a dime. I'd say that's pretty good.