SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ascend Communications (ASND) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: djane who wrote (52446)8/21/1998 2:39:00 AM
From: djane  Respond to of 61433
 
Networking Frontier: Data For All

techweb.com

August 03, 1998, Issue: 801
Section: Opinion/Editorial

Vadim Zlotnikov

While the deflationary impact of semiconductor overcapacity on the PC
industry has clearly been overanalyzed, the implications for the networking and
communications industry are less frequently discussed but equally important.

The nirvana of the communication industry is ubiquitous data
access-transmission at data rates sufficient to support full-motion video.

Although it is interesting to ponder the societal implications of such a network,
we are more concerned with the near-term transitional issues. The firming of
protocol standards, a semiconductor capacity glut and increased competition
are driving annual declines of 30 percent to 40 percent in the
cost-per-communication port.

The lower cost and increasing commoditization of enterprise networking has
profound implications for the suppliers and resellers of hardware, as well as
service providers.

At the high end of the food chain are telecom and WAN equipment suppliers,
such as Lucent Technologies, Northern Telecom, Tellabs, etc. These high-end
vendors serve relatively price-insensitive markets and offer sufficient product
differentiation so that lower semiconductor costs can be largely captured in the
higher profit margins, rather than passed on to the end user.

On the other extreme, network interface card, hub and certain switch
providers have seen a significant deceleration in sales growth, from mid-30
percent to about 7 percent, despite strong unit volume, due to the need to
pass on lower semiconductor prices.

Lower price, however, did not cause a collapse in profit margins, as the
software content of the networking gear kept products sufficiently entrenched
and differentiated.

This will change during the next few quarters, creating opportunities for
vendors and resellers.

In particular, much of the networking growth is occurring in the consumer, and
small- and midsize-business markets. Unlike the major corporations-which
must ensure compliance with legacy networking solutions and which are
frequently unable to easily switch suppliers-smaller accounts can more easily
take advantage of lower prices.

This in turn will permit companies like Compaq and other PC vendors to
move aggressively into some of the networking areas by undercutting the 35
percent to 50 percent gross margins enjoyed by networking vendors.

Standardization of Ethernet on the motherboard will further reduce the
cost-per-port and enable penetration of new markets.

Since most small and midsize accounts do not have a sophisticated network
administration staff, the onus will fall on resellers to develop the skills
necessary to install and support a highly networked environment.

If one were to take this opportunity a step further, it is easy to envision a
scenario where resellers use the networking expertise and lower capital
requirements of building a communication infrastructure to offer their small-
and midsize-business clients outsourcing services.

For example, resellers and certain PC vendors may be well-positioned to
offer Web hosting, intranet outsourcing, network-compliance testing and
multiple other services that will be demanded by small and midsize businesses.

VADIM ZLOTNIKOV is the technology analyst for Sanford C. Bernstein &
Co., New York, covering the PC and semiconductor industries. He welcomes
comments via E-mail at zvadim@bernstein.com.

Copyright r 1998 CMP Media Inc.



To: djane who wrote (52446)8/21/1998 2:41:00 AM
From: djane  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 61433
 
ASND/SRA transition issues (from Yahoo thread)

Message 20329 of
20447
Reply

ely34
lo_t
Aug 18 1998
4:04AM EDT

Sorry I didn't make myself clearer (it was a Monday morning
and all that!).

As for the percentage of the companies workforce involved in
the telco side it's hard to quantify. From what I have heard the
SRA management are still trying to figure out who fits where
(as in the telco or non-telco side) and this won't be decided
for a while. The split is not quite as black and white as you
may think. Take their engineering dept for instance.

All those working with their new product (Harmony) will go
to ASND (that was in the agreement with SRA). However
those giving product support for the computer side will stay
with the divested part. But what about those engineers that
don't fit in either catagory? Is the R&D dept going to be split
down the middle or is it going to the non-telco side? Then
with the sales force...some are moving over some are
not...and what about SRAs manufacturing facility...are ASND
going to take it or leave it for the divested part?...are they
going to use it to manufacture their own products?...are they
going to produce their products on the same shop floor as
SRA? As far as I can make out there is a bit of confusion.

Back to the servicing agreements. I'm not talking about
software support but hardware support! SRA have service
agrrements that can last 10 years or more (remember SRA is
primarily a h/w company with some s/w subsiduaries such as
S2). SRA will still design and produce their products (Radio,
Continuum etc.) which in turn will be used by ASND. SRA
will hold the servicing agreements to provide product support.
Thus if ASND have a hardware problem (in any product
other than Harmony) they will have to turn to SRA.

As for the divesting...word has it that the software
subsiduaries of SRA will be sold off to the highest bidder and
that they are looking for a "management buyout" for the
computer side making it an "indepentent" company.

But hey...stranger things have happened.

L

ps sorry if this is incoherent but it is verrryyyy early in the
morning ;)