Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TTOSBT who wrote (62952)	8/21/1998 10:58:00 AM
From: carl a. mehr	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

OTOT RE:-"The (Clinton) witch hunt no doubt will bring out some surprising events but it was a witch hunt, you, me or no one -let alone the president, should ever have to go through." I respectfully disagree. Let's get the facts out, so we will know what our public buildings are being used for. I do, however, as the great spiritual leader of the flock find it impossible to forgive those that voted for the Scumbag the second time around. Another great cost will be removal of the 'horny' karma in the Oral office. Who will pay? Will part of the White House have to be torn down? There will be a party here in San Diego on Fiesta Island (near Sea World) on the first Saturday at 12 o'clock noon after the announcement of Clintons departure from office. If you drink to have fun you must bring a designated non-drinking driver. I will bring my wife as she does not drink.<vbg> Lord help me to remain humble and learn to forgive, humble carl

To: TTOSBT who wrote (62952)	8/21/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

And so may you. I think it is a world disgrace what we have put our country through. Four years of continual investigation over 40million tax payer dollars three or four inconclusive investigations of extortion, money laundering, bank fraud, even murder, and we know that our president had an extra marital affair and then denied it in public. Not to mention the set up of our lands highest figure by interns with secret taping's. Isn't that what Nixon was disgraced for -secretly taping unknowing oval office visitors? And, it appears obvious, under oath in a sworn deposition in a law suit against him. (You try that and see if an apology suffices. If it won't work for you then it won't work for the President. He's not royalty as much as you may consider him so.) The NY Times has reportedly published that Lewinski testified that Clinton did indeed fondle her, removing any pretense that his statement was "legally accurate" because he didn't touch her anywhere. Blame the First Liar for the last seven months and about $5,000,000 of the investigation. Starr never forced the President to lie. He did that all on his own. Don't blame those who found the truth. After all, Starr's just doing the job that Attorney General Janet Reno and a three judge panel gave him. I think it's a disgrace to have a President of any party getting blow jobs from a woman young enough to be his daughter in the White House and then looking us right in the eye and emphatically denying it as if he believes we're so stupid that we'll believe anything he says. If he'll lie about this what else will he lie about? Nixon was disgraced for lying about the Watergate break in and trying to obstruct an investigation into it, not for taping his conversations. Nixon was done in by the Watergate Cover Up. The Clinton administration is the administration of stonewalling and cover up. Did you know that the Nixon Articles of Impeachment included charges of "Making false or misleading public statements for the purpose of deceiving the people of the United States..."? Here's Nixon's articles modified (very slightly, I might add) for Clinton. I have no connection to the political party that seems to have put this out. emporium.turnpike.net Some analysis: tiac.net Here are some quotes from Clinton when running for Congress during the Nixon fiasco in 1974. I'm sure that since Drudge found them that you'll ignore the fact that they're true and instead say the source means they must be discarded. === At the height of Watergate in the summer of 1974, during Bill Clinton's race to become a U.S. Representative from Arkansas, Clinton once declared: "If a President of the United States ever lied to the American people he should resign." === "No question that an admission of making false statements to government officials and interfering with the FBI is an impeachable offense." -- Bill Clinton, ARKANSAS GAZETTE, August 8, 1974, page 7-A. === "REPRESENTATIVE IS 'OUT OF STEP,' CLINTON CHARGES" was the headline in the newspaper on August 8, 1974. "I think it is plain that the president should resign and spare the country the agony of impeachment and removal proceedings." "I think the country could be spared a lot of agony... if he'd go on and resign," Bill Clinton declared. === Bill Clinton, Democratic candidate for the 3rd Congressional District, said, "There is nothing left to say. There's no point putting this country through an impeachment since [Nixon] isn't making any pretense of innocence now... This country has suffered so long."

To: TTOSBT who wrote (62952)	8/21/1998 11:53:00 AM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

RE:"The entire country knew Clinton was a smooth talking womanizer before he was ever elected president. The witch hut no doubt will bring out some surprising events but it was a witch hut, you, me or no one -let alone the president, should ever have to go through." Apparently they didn't and many still deny it. What about the Clinton supporters who belived him when he said "I did not have sex with that woman, Ms Lewinsky". Those supporters sure look silly now. Clinton expects us to believe all this is new news to Hillary? Witch hunt? If you were under investigation for say tax evasion, do you expet the IRS just to give up afer 7 months of stonewalling by the taxpayer and claiming "witch hunt"? Ha Ha think again.