Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Ricker who wrote (5962)	8/21/1998 7:16:00 AM
From: norwalk hawk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6735

correction- Company A builds a pilot scale test plant in New Mexico. The pilot plant works perfect. Then they attempt to build a full scale production facility for $100 million, their whole wad, and they run out of money. The plant was more expensive than they projected. They are unable to obtain more financing to complete the plant (work the bugs out of the system). Question: Does this mean Company A's technology doesn't work or that they need to locate more money to make the adjustments to the system to see if the technology works?

To: Larry Ricker who wrote (5962)	8/22/1998 12:34:00 PM
From: bigtoe	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6735

Professor, If Idiot A tells Idiot B how simple things are, but, in order to make the example simple, Idiot A invents statements like: >>>... they (Company B) have budgeted for a series of design upgrades. They haven't made any wild promises as to a production start-up date...<<< and... >>> They have a plan for putting in a pipeline...but...they don't have to if things look bad<<< Should Idiot B ask Idiot A from where did such conclusions spring? Idiot A should stick to facts and not embellish facts with nonsense in order to fit his little word problems. What 'grade' do you teach? regards, bigtoe