Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Hensley who wrote (2454)	8/21/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

>>Hubbell went to jail for stealing from his good friends at the Rose Law firm. Starr is appealing throwing out the indictment.<< John, wasn't Hubbell given a temporary "reprieve" from the courts as it relates to the income tax evasion fraud? I thought the court said that his "immunity agreement" was violated. Starr is appealing that decision. bp

To: John Hensley who wrote (2454)	8/21/1998 1:56:00 PM
From: Doughboy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

I apologize, I did not mean to imply that I was responding to your mistakes and falsities. In fact, I've found you one of the more credible foes on this thread. As for my statements in that post, I don't think that anything I said was wrong; incomplete, maybe. My point was that all indications are that Starr does not have a good case on Whitewater and he does not have the leverage to get more out of Susan, Webb, and James to make a complete case. And conjoining the Little Rock and Pepperdine point, I meant that both of those are indications that he's folding up the tent, not that they occurred contemporaneously. Okay?