Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (63019)	8/21/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: John Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Gerald,re:"Under oath". Again! From Clinton! What's it worth!

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (63019)	8/21/1998 2:41:00 PM
From: TTOSBT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Re: "Bzzzt! Wrong again. The tapes are where Lewinsky was confiding to Tripp that she intended to lie if deposed in that case. It was after Clinton allegedly perjured himself in this case that Starr became involved. After seven months of Clinton stonewalling Starr only now has the President's testimony under oath." Excuse me unless I head wrong. I think the tapes were brought to Starr before he called Clinton in the Paula Jones disposition? Therefore it is highly suspect that Starr listen to the tapes and then proceeded to expertly question Clinton so as to have him either expose himself or lie about exposing himself. <ggg> Either way Starr couldn't have lost by having those tapes. My point is Starr took advantage of his special position to entrap. TTOSBT