To: Larry Macklin who wrote (15840 ) 8/25/1998 11:11:00 AM From: Jerry in Omaha Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 20681
Mr. Macklin, <<Regardless of what i have said i am sure you will have some type of comeback to dispute me but i feel i have made my point and that is the last i will say on the subject so go ahead and take your best shot! >> I did take my best shot and it was a compliment to you. In my original posting that you seemed to misread (or perhaps you were just following the misread of Henry) how can you construe any but my stated support for your position even though you did not state it correctly? I said; "Larry, you may be right as to what Naxos ought to be, or have the capacity for but Naxos is not currently describing itself as engaged in research and development of anything save real estate." First Henry read that paragraph and thought I was declaring that Naxos is a Real Estate company, and you thought I was taking some kind of cheap shot at you. Where do you get that? What gives? Then you say... <<now you have completely lost me so i must be an idiot! Why couldn't you buy a property before it is completely researched? Seems like a lot of jr mining comanies do just that. Naxos researches. Naxos develops. > Because, Larry, according to their own published words Naxos explores a property. It does not "research" a property. A research and development company researches basic science and develops a technology from that basic science research. Naxos "develops" its property (real estate) by drilling holes, getting permits, proving up reserves...etc. All I have been suggesting all along, Larry, in fraternal equanimity, is that you take care not to play the idiot and keep confusing the terminology. It's just as important as the accuracy of the terminology on the labels on your prescriptions. Jerard P