Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/21/1998 10:44:00 PM
From: Paul Beattie	Respond to of 11149

Hi Gary, StochRSI - Hip Hip Hooray! Parabolic SAR would be useful. Negative Volume Index is another suggestion. Thanks for a great product. It was good to meet you in Cleveland. All of us appreciated your taking time to share your vision and plans with us. Paul

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/22/1998 4:48:00 AM
From: Michael Quarne	Respond to of 11149

HI Gary, Yes PSAR, and Lin Regression. Also as Tokens. And perhaps the ability to use Token items in a Reports master that you select tokens from or reports the tokens in your scan. Making the report of scan results with ranking of the results by the results. Thus scans run faster, (not needing to println more than the symbol,) reports are more clearly understood. Arctic Mike

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/22/1998 11:11:00 AM
From: gonzongo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11149

Gary- if we only have 3 for this next upgrade- I would go for : StochRSI CCI and Parabolic SAR. g

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/22/1998 12:59:00 PM
From: Alton Stephens	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11149

Gary, yes. Parabolic SAR. Al

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/22/1998 10:05:00 PM
From: bdog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11149

Gary, StochRSI and CCI. Cool! I suppose my backtest scans will be much faster then... now it takes about 1 second per day for a stochrsi backtest or about 22 minutes! same stock only takes 2 minutes looking back for 2 stochastic situations. which brings me to another "supposing"...the above stochastic scan with 7 [if] conditions runs in 2 minutes, if I turn it into 2 [if] conditions with [and] statements it takes 7 minutes.. so I suppose it is faster to use more [if] statements rather than piling up the line with a bunch of [and's]? anybody please clear my feeble programing mind with the truth here! thanks bdog

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/23/1998 3:11:00 AM
From: bdog	Respond to of 11149

Gary, awesome little piece of code and service you guys put out! Will future versions allow for insertion of user determined formulas in movavg() or only tokens? bdog

To: Gary Lyben who wrote (6093)	8/23/1998 8:35:00 PM
From: RICHARD LOCKIE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11149

Gary: Since you have text describing each symbol (company) in the fundamental portion of QP2, it would be nice if a text scan could be made available. For example, if I wanted to scan for stocks making fiber optic cables, I could input this and scan through the text portion only. Richard Lockie