Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FR1 who wrote (31430)	8/22/1998 12:06:00 AM
From: Senator949	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 97611

Whooppee!!! What do you get with Celeron besides the Intel name? From what I've heard they're real dogs. I read something today that stated Intel is quickly bringing out new Celeron variants with L2 cache as the current versions just don't make it. I believe my year old 233Mhz AMD K6 will supposedly outperform this 333 Mhz Celeron. Robin

To: FR1 who wrote (31430)	8/22/1998 5:47:00 AM
From: Aitch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 97611

Thread, Talk is that the new 128k cache Celeron's outperform the older 0k Celeron substantially. This bodes well for CPQ Consumer Product Division! Intel IComp Index 2.0 results as follows: Celeron 266MHz 0k cache 213 Celeron 300MHz 0k cache 226 Pentium II 233MHz 512k cache 267 Celeron 300A 128k cache 296 Pentium II 266MHz 512k cache 303 Celeron 333MHz 128k cache 308 Pentium II 300MHz 512k cache 318 Pentium II 333MHz 512k cache 332 H