Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: risk-averse who wrote (22842)	8/22/1998 10:15:00 AM
From: Craig K	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

What ... he is not telling the truth...???? Oh my....I made several investment decisions based on what this Dr. Vee...said and all....after all he is a Doctor ... Right??? I thought they were supposed to be smart people....I sure hope those purchases that I made work out....wouldn't want to accuse Dr. Vee.. of giving out bad investment advice..... Craig.... Worried about being "Misled"......

To: risk-averse who wrote (22842)	8/22/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: bullmarket	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

naysayers initially took the "antagonistic" approach on the thread to create panic/confusion. Nobody believed them and they left...for a while. Seeing how strong DGIV thread is and the unity of loyal shareholders, naysayers are now trying the opposite approach in a new game plan, in a sort of "if you can't beat them, then join them" approach!. They will act that they are one of the true DGIV investors and try to give the false impression that the thread is "hyping" news supposedly gained from "conversations" with DGIV management. BAD MOVE...it is too TRANSPARENT! Also, like risk-averse wrote, it is easy to DISPROVE. Phone records, interviews with DGIV management would quickly show that the naysayers were LYING. I also wonder how certain three-letter government organization would look upon TOTAL FABRICATIONS posted by naysayers in an attempt to "smear" the good name of a company and its CEO AND to intentionally deceive investors?