Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jules B. Garfunkel who wrote (63115)	8/22/1998 1:31:00 PM
From: Barry Grossman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Jules, Good morning. Thanks for having such a good memory regarding Kurlack. I've given up any hope of his quick disappearance and instead use him as a contrary indicator. Worked well in the spring when his call helped bring INTC from high 70's to 65-66, which is where I couldn't resist the Oct 75's. He just gives us long term bulls a chance to profit from his stupidity and the masses that listen to his nonsense. I grit my teeth when I read his perceptions but get my wallet ready to pick up some cheaper INTC or calls. He did it again this time and I took advantage again. Ashok Kumar, on the other hand, I have listened to with increasing attention over the last few years. He appears on CNBC frequently with well reasoned and eloquent speech. I have yet to see Kurlack's face there. Does that tell you something? Why is Kurlack so invisible? Might be some flip-flop questions he wouldn't want mentioned on the public air. Just some Saturday morning musings. Oh, and while I'm musing, has anyone who has been arguing the Clinton/Starr flaptrap bothered to point out the utter RECKLESSNESS of the man we have entrusted with the most important elected job on earth? He has admitted to doing something that indeed should be private between consenting adults. He has possibly been illegally involved in a cover-up of the facts. I'm not going to bother mentioning any other aspects of the Starr investigation but isn't what he has already admitted he has done so reckless that it ought to disqualify the man from this high office, at least in the minds of the public, if not the votes in Congress? To quote Thomas G. Busillo from yesterday, "The Death of Outrage, to use Bill Bennett's term, is a ubiquitous, corrosive phenomenon." How sad that I am probably in the minority on this subject. Barry