SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : TLAB info? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chuzzlewit who wrote (3229)8/22/1998 1:38:00 PM
From: craig crawford  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7342
 
>> I have always contended that the purchase of CIEN was basically a technology issue <<

And I did not. The technology wasn't worth $7 billion in my eyes. It was worth more like $4 billion. In light of new information, maybe it's only worth $3 billion.

>> But, if Ciena's technology is that important to the future of TLAB the deal will go through (although significantly modifies) <<

I don't disagree that the merger will probably go through. As everyone else believes, it will probably have to be modified to a more attractive price for TLAB.

>> The difference is that the blue sky aspects will be stripped away, and the focus will be on the technology rather than on Ciena's book of existing business. <<

I agree, technology is about all that's left! Their business seems to be crumbling away.

>> As to your point behind the value of the technology, who's to say? The market is currently telling us that with its projected earnings of say $.15 for the quarter the value of the company is around $3.2 billion, <<

Seems about right.

>> Ciena's short term prospects as a stand alone company do not look particularly bright <<

Yes, it is becoming more apparent each day.

>> It has a small customer base and limited product offerings which makes it extremely vulnerable to the loss of just one or two customers and product obsolescence. <<

True. I think CIEN has good enough technology/experience to become a serious player in the short-haul field. I considered CIEN's few large customers the bread and butter which was going to keep the company liquid as it diversified into the short-haul market. Obviously the short-haul market has yet to emerge and the long-haul market is getting crowded. I have always been more interested in Ciena's short-haul prospects than their current long-haul offerings. I considered long-haul a means to an end.

>> Well, in the over all scheme of things I think it is a small thing. Look at it this way. The gross profit on the deal would be roughly $50 million, and the after-tax earnings would be roughly $35 million. As a single event, so what? But if this is an indication of how customers view Ciena's technology, it is a very big thing indeed! <<

That's what I meant. I wasn't referring to the actual dollar amount so much as the lack of confidence instilled from losing potential large customers. Still, $100 million is 15-20% revenues down the drain. Not to mention the millions of dollars and countless hours wasted courting AT&T for the last year. I also felt that if CIEN could work their way into being T's supplier of choice, (big pipe dream eh?) that it could expand into several hundred million dollars, not just $100 million.

>> So let me ask you this: do you, as a TLAB s/h believe the deal should go through, and at what price? <<

I'm not a shareholder of TLAB or CIEN. Remember, I am a position trader not a buy and holder. Just because a company is listed in my profile as a favorite doesn't mean I am always long it. In fact there are times when I am short certain favorites in my profile.

In answer to your question, yes I think TLAB should go forward and buy CIEN. If I was a TLAB holder and the deal was going to go 1 for 1 I would be extremely upset and dump TLAB. I'm sure it's either renegotiate the deal or it's off. If I was a CIEN holder I would want the merger to go through as well. I think it's in everyone's best interest for the deal to go through at a renegotiated price.