SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jenna who wrote (13299)8/22/1998 2:20:00 PM
From: Judy  Respond to of 120523
 
You do alot of reseach and filtering to provide trade candidates that can offer a high probablity of success, and so do I. But whether or not the trade is successful for the individual trader depends primarily on their nimbleness, acuity in reading the market/stock, and their risk management skills ... all factors that have nothing to do with what we post.

Let me give an example. Some days ago I posted about DD ...

Message 5489413

I post things in advance so readers can pick entry/exit and overall strategy according to what works for them, or discount the trade possibility in total. Now if someone entered DD at 54-55 and the furiousness of the market selloff took it further down to 52ish and they got stopped out ... was DD a bad choice?? Now again, if someone bought DD at 54-55 held it down and rode it back up to 59ish in a positional trade ... was DD a good choice?? I don't bottomfish, and normally wait for the stock to pivot up ... 54-55 would be my pivot for the ride up on DD. And I don't give a fig whether people think DD was a good choice or not. It's a matter of how one handles the trade.

Yes, it is easy to criticize and hard to find workable trades in a shakey market. Do notice that those who criticize are seldom the ones who contribute, and those who contribute seldom criticize. It's a fact of life at SI.



To: Jenna who wrote (13299)8/22/1998 2:44:00 PM
From: Jerry Olson  Respond to of 120523
 
Hi Jenna

I'm back from the "real" wars!!!<g>...

Interesting week huh???

As I told IKe early this week, the semis & semi equips were NOT a good play...I mentioned to some friends that AMAT was a great short...

I do not think this selloff is over...I thought the rally would be stronger 100-200 more points...that bothered me somewhat...but actually the "war" move is noise anyway...so we should fly upward to my near term target 8800-8900....a 50% retracement from the lows or down from the highs<GGG>...

Anyway I just wanted to say to everyone who lives here, in my 25-30 years of actively trading these markets, rarely have I encountered anyone remotely as good as Jenna, or for that matter Miss Judy....

The incredible amount of work & research & knowledge that goes into each and every post is truly remarkable to me...yes, even me!!!!...:>}

Girls onward and upward, keep forging ahead...2X4's & bricks, that'll get their attention....

Later



To: Jenna who wrote (13299)8/22/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Jeff Jordan  Respond to of 120523
 
Jenna,

My take is.....since a majority of stocks have already been gutted 30% from highs, I feel the market will rebound very soon and strongly. The remaining 20% my guess, will continue to bring the broader market down. So my view is an aggressive 50+% investment at this time is appropriate. Without a doubt the most beaten down quality stocks now will be the big winners for '98/'99 season.

I admit I have been ignoring my charts and buying anyway. ????

Jeff



To: Jenna who wrote (13299)8/23/1998 1:46:00 AM
From: mr.mark  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 120523
 
jenna, the way i read these posts, jjb (#reply-5564036) was responding to rookie dave (#reply-5563080).

whether jjb is being too tough on rookie dave is one question. but by the looks of your reply, you seem to think jjb was posting to you. i don't think so.

bwdik...