Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wallacestevens who wrote (491)	8/22/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: LesX	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Do have me confused with someone else? I never once made a comment on Michelle's looks. LesX

To: wallacestevens who wrote (491)	8/22/1998 3:44:00 PM
From: alan w	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 67261

wallacestevens, Oh thank you for enlightening me on religion. We'll all remember not to say anything about Ms. Harris' looks. The Clinton defenders wonderfully correct discussion on this thread of ML(lifestyle) or LT(looks) is so politically correct and feeling of their pain. What you fail to understand is if it wasn't ML it would be someone else. This guy can't stay out of trouble. If this episode doesn't relieve him of his duties, there will always be the next one. And I, for one, will not beat around the bush. I hope he is ousted for any reason. Jaywalking, library fine, anything. Just please let us be rid of him. Why are we supposed to trust him on this missle attack. To me, he had that same steely glare during his announcement of the attack that he had saying this, "I want you to listen to me, I did NOT have relations with that woman, Ms. Lewinsky" Please enlighten me as to which time we are supposed to believe him. And I am being serious about this point. When are we supposed to believe him. alan w