SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : HONG KONG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MikeM54321 who wrote (2144)8/22/1998 7:35:00 PM
From: Tom  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 2951
 
RE: 2144 "Please feel free to correct any errors."

I couldn't do that, Mike. Thanks for taking the time to separate and deliver the morsels. Very tasty.

On another subject: I am opposed to the activities being conducted by market speculators, and am suspicious of the employment or interests of any that do.

Speculators draw their ammunition from currency systems that are nothing more than co-operative pyramid schemes which nearly every nation has accepted for its standard. Without the fractional reserve concept serving as a springboard to liquidity, and the accommodating legislation, the speculative attacks on a scale we are now witnessing would not be possible.

Being, for the most part, large banking institutions and giant hedge funds, they are the sovereignless and reckless bastard entities of global trade and commerce. They operate under the guise of large-scale arbitrage that is purported to maintain the fair value of markets; which might be acceptable were the target markets in fair health. That many are not should preclude claims to fairness or equipoise. Any argument to the contrary is mooted by the fact that many of the speculators' resources are replenished circuitously via the IMF and World Bank's involvement in re-establishing or "stabilising" unhealthy economies.

Keep in mind, on similar occasion in the future, that a relentless speculative attack will not be conducted on any market that is not foreseen to be a client of the IMF or parallel entity. Knowing this, it only follows that some pretend certain knowledge of an eventual bailout treatment for China.

I could go on at great length, but suffices to say that were there no IMF, or similar guarantor, the speculators would be nothing more than another manageable market element.



To: MikeM54321 who wrote (2144)8/23/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: Ron Bower  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2951
 
Tom,

THanks for the break down, but doesn't it mean more than your breakdown. I felt I was reading more evidence that the Asia crisis will be effecting the US much worse than the government and talking heads predict.

Thanks again,
Ron