Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jeffbas who wrote (4774)	8/22/1998 10:43:00 PM
From: kahunabear	Respond to of 78621

REITS may represent very good value now. Look what this did to the price of the stock: biz.yahoo.com or read this earnings announcement from LTC and notice the part about selling the property in Montana: biz.yahoo.com It is just one property, but not a bad return. IMHO, some properties on the REIT's books may be carried significantly below market or replacement cost. With many REITs selling at close to or below book, it may be a good time to buy. The interesting thing is that the assets on their books may be more liquid than many other value plays. WS

To: jeffbas who wrote (4774)	8/22/1998 10:56:00 PM
From: Paul Senior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78621

And I agree the point is to do better. That's always the point IMO. But I am saying that if stock market happiness is dependent on beating the market or beating index funds-- there will mostly be disappointment. Very few people who call themselves investors can beat the market consistently (by 'investors' I exclude people who worked at MCD or WMT for 20 years and just bought or took company stock.) Why set yourself up for disappointment when it's not necessary? When it's about trying to reach goals and using compounding. Or are we just talking asset allocation here? If someone has a large portfolio consisting of bonds/stocks/cash/ and within that, stocks amount to say maybe 15% (or say stocks amount to 40 percent, but 25% are in index funds), well then maybe I could see setting a beat-the-index goal. But in this case, just reallocating more funds to the market from bonds/cash would seem to me less heart-wrenching and accomplish the same goal than trying to beat the indexes. For someone with an 90/10 stock/bond ratio, trying to beat the market is crazy if one's portfolio is already substantial.