Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (966)	8/23/1998 12:42:00 PM
From: bmart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Ms. Shell, Exactly how are you equating DELL to AZNT? Can you be, just this once, clear and definitive, or is your SOP include attempting guilt by association too? RB

To: Janice Shell who wrote (966)	8/23/1998 12:48:00 PM
From: Cavalry	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

that was then, reverse mergers were not all the rage and the price to do an ipo was 1/5 of what it is now, tell bob lessin former vice chairman of smith barney and now head of wit capital and his blue chip board of directors on ipty- formerly, wsaid into ipty, board includes owner of 1 800 flowers former head of danskin, and the beat goes on, that was then this is now, now reverse mergers are an economical way to get in the game, sorry bad argument, imo cav ps i still respect you so please don't try to list all bad reverse mergers to counter my argument or i can save you the time when you post look at icvi into mtei, here is my response in advance different company, different scenario, not relevant to aznt or ipty analogy.

To: Janice Shell who wrote (966)	8/23/1998 2:30:00 PM
From: Dixie7777	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

DELL went public in the ordinary way, with respectable underwriters and institutional support. They were never a BB company. Dear Miss Janice, Whilst I don't wish to appear to be supporting this AZNT thing, (they may or may not have a serious company,) your continued bashing of BB stock for the sheer pleasure of pointing out they are BB stock, and will probably always be BB stocks, implies that all BB stocks must be bad and therefore essentially impugns the reputation of all BB stocks. I believe it might be wise of you to do some research on the following BB stocks before you continue to do damage to decent companies just because of their lineage. quote.yahoo.com quote.yahoo.com quote.yahoo.com It might do well for everyone here to recognize that many good companies have started on the Bb, and many have elected to stay on the BB. The continual bashing of investors in BB stocks by this *gang of effete fringe people* needs to be understood for what it is. Collective personal dysfunctionality at the cyber level. Sounds about right. Gee I wonder if AZNT has a twig or bush for that ailment?