Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doughboy who wrote (2746)	8/23/1998 1:53:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Respond to of 13994

<<<There are no good explanations for this except let me take a stab at what the President's lawyers will say: 1) this testimony as well as all the other Lewinsky testimony was not "material" and thus cannot be the basis for perjury.>>> Uhh, yeah right. The "President's lawyers" have done such a marvelous job of convincing the courts of their stands and I am sure that this has a much better chance of standing up. <rolling eyes> <<<(2) As Lewinsky used the phrase "sexual relations," she was not bound by or even aware of the Court's definition of "sexual relations,">>> Sigh, no she used something that you haven't tried in quite a long while obviously.....common sense. <<It's not an explanation to write home about, but it's the best I can do. Bennett must be kicking himself for those questions, in hindsight.>>> Gee, Oppenheimer has spoke again! Listen up Doughbrain. If you can't tell your mother about it then it probably isn't the avenue you wish to travel. Please tell us you are one of the President's lawyers.