SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: risk-averse who wrote (22989)8/23/1998 5:47:00 PM
From: Ronaldo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50264
 
Why is it that these people who actively attack DGIV are always thinking "for us", being "us" DGIV shareholders. I don't think that I have been taken, I do not hope to dupe others.

Notably they have expanded their scope of thinking and now also think for the "SI" management.

Bird wrote:"Maybe SI management thinks a divergent perspective on a thread is refreshing; and maybe they have the same opinion as I.

I can't help but think the professed longs that post here also know they've been taken, but are hoping to dupe others into buying
their shares in a temporary false PR.."





To: risk-averse who wrote (22989)8/23/1998 5:49:00 PM
From: bullmarket  Respond to of 50264
 
it is not illegal to be an idiot, which he has proven multiples times.
However, it is indeed illegal to be libelous!
by the way, we will see how SI views his libelous post regarding DGIV, given how closely they "monitor" posters'"code of conduct".



To: risk-averse who wrote (22989)8/23/1998 8:00:00 PM
From: RocketMan  Respond to of 50264
 
Just let Bird babble, he adds nothing to this thread. Digitcom will succeed or fail based on its contracts and its financials, that simple. No one of us can make this company or break this company.

Bird might be courting some legal liability concerning libel, and he may be demonstrating his paranoia, but that is a personal problem for him.