Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (2792)	8/24/1998 8:24:00 AM
From: Liatris Spicata	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13994

Ann- The president you whom defend, Bill Clinton, claims he ordered the bombing of targets in foreign countries because they were being used for terrorist activities and that he had evidence that they were planning more attacks against Americans. Now granted that the man is an admitted liar, whose lies go back years (if you heard is first statement about Gennifer Flowers, you would have thought he denied his affair with her too, and by the way there were no black churches burned in Arkansas when he was growing up) my question for you is this: do you believe his claim? If so, why? Why should I?? Even though I am very suspicious of groups like Bin Laden's, I find myself questioning Sleazebag Bill's motives in ordering the attacks and the accuracy of his claims. This is simply one example, the consequences of which could become quite serious, of what happens when a democratically elected leader his exposed as the liar that Billary has proven to be. How you can defend such casual disregard for the truth on the part of the President of the United States is beyond me. Larry