SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Tech Stock Options -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (50527)8/23/1998 7:29:00 PM
From: donald sew  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58727
 
Lisa,

>>>>>>>>> also on a 60 minute chart it looks like we have a triple bottom..............dont these bottoms have some significance and indicate a possible hard bounce... <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

Lisa, actually it is a quadrupal botton, hitting the 520 support on the OEX on AUG 5,11,17,21, and a quad bottom in such a short time frame is not common.

It will indicate a bounce, but not neccessarily a hard bounce. I actually feel that a double bottom or a triple bottom have the better chance of a hard bounce to the upside. Also many triple bottoms are interpreted as an INVERSE HEAD & SHOULDER, which often indicates a longer-term bottom, unfortunately that failed since a QUAD bottom occured.

Frankly, I just dont like the speed that the last bottom of the QUAD was formed. It happened so fast and easily breaking many support lines(intraday support lines) so easily. We also have to keep in mind that the upswing was 325 points, but the dowswing from the highs at 8750 to 8320 is 430 points. Simply put, the recent downswing was 30% greater than the previous upswing - just not a good sign, even in light of the quad bottom.

Seeya



To: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9 who wrote (50527)8/23/1998 9:57:00 PM
From: donald sew  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58727
 
Lisa,

>>>>>>> btw, check out my new pic of you...now THAT is how I imagine you...ROFLMAO <<<<<<<<<<<<<<

WELL, WELL, WELL - first you think Im a GEEK, now you are implying that you thought I was fat, or something like a relative a BUDDHA.

Well, you know that half naked woman in that picture - I sure didnt picture you that way. gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg

ROFL.

seeya