Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tony Viola who wrote (63233)	8/24/1998 1:42:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tony, When is first heard of them having 128K of full speed cache I surmised they would be faster than the P-IIs lower than 400 Mhz, ie those with 66 Mhz bus, the 333 P-II and the 350 P-II due to the fact that the cache was full CPU speed. Now I see from the Intel URL that is is 32K cache and it only does around 25% better than the old Celerons. I expected them to be faster than that. : "This Celeron will easily defeat all but the fastest Pentium IIs (400 Mhz up)" IE those below 400 Mhz= 333/350? I would like to see a comparison betwen a new celeron 333 and a P-II 333. Bill