Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Auric Goldfinger's Short List -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Circle who wrote (112)	8/25/1998 5:36:00 PM
From: Phil(bullrider)	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 19428

Circle, I noticed that since you joined SI a week or so ago, the only messages you have posted have been on the CYPH thread, or on Auric's thread because he recommended it as a short opportunity. Most of us here on SI see that as a sign of a paid shill. Is this the only company you own stock in or simply the only one you are worried about? Just wondering, Phil

To: Circle who wrote (112)	8/26/1998 2:43:00 PM
From: El Matador	Respond to of 19428

Re: Short Naked CYPH naked calls. Mr. Circle I have reviewed the post linked to this one and I concur that you are correct in you view that being short CYPH is like being short naked calls. Yes, the way I see it, Auric et al are short EXPIRING OUT OF THE MONEY CALLS in a BEAR Market for small cap stocks, particularly questionable pharmaceutical startups that wee founded as was CYPH in 1991 and publicly traded since 1995 and have yet to produce any meaningful revenues let alone profits.