SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : JMAR Technologies(JMAR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Starlight who wrote (6428)8/24/1998 7:03:00 PM
From: Bilberry  Respond to of 9695
 
Also, could the original $10 million swiss private placement been partially targeted toward raising funds for XRL and brightlight? At that time, I think that JMAR did not believe that they would be getting any new contracts from DARPA. In fact, the DARPA web page said there would be nothing beyond 1997 for XRL if my memory is correct. I wonder why the government changed their mind and decided to further fund it.

--Bilberry



To: Starlight who wrote (6428)8/24/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Richaaard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 9695
 
Betty, are you listening to me at all? There was NO money expected from DARPA and XRL was on schedule. Why then would it matter when the paper work or money came through?

I'm making too much out of a non-issue? Many analyst and semi-conductor people have only heard of JMAR because of its' trumpeting of their forthcoming XRL. I think that when a company states a time frame in which they claim to be able to do something that they should produce, or be willing to face some questions. I see conflicting reasons given for the delay so I'm naturally concerned. You don't see this as worth discussing?

Richard