SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LAST MILE TECHNOLOGIES - Let's Discuss Them Here -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1972)8/25/1998 1:21:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Respond to of 12823
 
1-Meg Modem To Debut -- [NYC] Carrier Preps Bandwidth Option To DSL

August 25, 1998 COMPUTER RESELLER NEWS via NewsEdge
Corporation : New York -- Although a digital subscriber
line standard will not be finished until October, a small
carrier plans to cash in this fall with a similar service
using products that already are shipping.

The service, a splitterless DSL-like offering, uses line
cards, eliminating the need for a special multiplexer at a
carrier's central office, which is required by some forms
of DSL. The service, however, is proprietary in that the
line card in the central office must terminate in a
Northern Telecom Inc. central office switch.


Business customers in New York's metropolitan area are
expected to be the first to try Nortel's 1-Meg Modem
when TransWire Communications Inc., a competitive
local exchange carrier based here, stokes its service in
October or early November.

TransWire already sells a limited service in Manhattan.

TransWire is the first carrier to deploy this DSL-like
technology at " popular" prices, said Peter Bernstein,
president of Infonautics Consulting Inc., Ramsey, N.J.

But some other small carriers plan to offer the 1-Meg
Modem service, including Champaign Telephone, a
carrier based in Urbana, Ohio, and MegsINet Inc., a
Chicago-based ISP that plans to launch a multistate
service this fall.

"TransWire will be closely watched because with all the
hemming and hawing in the regulatory environment,
here is a company that will be in the business
competing," Bernstein said.

Although VARs will be able to recommend the service,
there are no immediate plans for a reseller program, said
Nortel executives.

Nortel's 1-Meg Modem has a somewhat different
modulation scheme than the form of DSL pitched by the
Universal ADSL Working Group (UAWG), an
organization of carriers and hardware and software
manufacturers. UAWG promotes its own low-cost,
splitterless version of ADSL, called G.lite.

Nortel's technology will support the G.lite standard
"when it delivers the same value proposition as the
1-Meg Modem," said Stephen Edwards, Nortel's vice
president of data access solutions.

G.lite, backed by computer and software companies
including Microsoft Corp., Intel Corp. and Compaq
Computer Corp. as well as numerous carriers, is expected
to be approved by an international standards committee
in October.

Customers can expect products supporting the standard
by the end of the year, analysts said.

In addition to its work with the UAWG, Microsoft has
hedged its bets by also supporting Nortel's 1-Meg
Modem. The software giant last week said it has
installed the modem along with its Windows NT Server
Internet Telephony applications at the Microsoft Partner
Solutions Center.

Nortel's technology is better suited to running on the
aging twisted-pair wire installed throughout much of the
country, including the New York area, said Terrence
Peck, TransWire's chief executive.

Other forms of DSL have problems running on older
copper plant infrastructure at any distance, and some
forms of DSL cannot coexist in the same bindery of wire
because they radiate too much, Peck said.

Still, there is a price to pay in sheer power.

The CRN Test Center recently clocked the 1-Meg
Modem at speeds slower than some DSL modems. But
the 1-Meg Modem still is 17 times faster than a
56-Kbit-per-second modem, however, and almost eight
times faster than an ISDN modem in the downstream
direction.

"There are a lot of different proprietary technologies out
there today that will sacrifice speed for distance, so the
concept is not new," said Beth Gage, a senior broadband
consultant at TeleChoice, Verona, N.J.

Copyright - 1998 CMP Media Inc.

By Margie Semilof

<<COMPUTER RESELLER NEWS -- 08-24-98, p. PG1>>

[Copyright 1998, CMP Publications]




To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (1972)8/25/1998 1:41:00 PM
From: Frank A. Coluccio  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12823
 
FCC To Investigate GTE's DSL Digital Service

[Jurisdictional Border Skirmishes]

August 25, 1998

WASHINGTON, D.C., U.S.A., Newsbytes via NewsEdge
Corporation : The Federal Communications Commission
Friday announced that it would open investigations into
GTE's plans to offer a digital subscriber line service. GTE
hopes the service will be taxed at the federal level, but
this has met opposition from a number of companies that
maintain the line should be taxed at the state level.

The commission has found there is little precedent on
record to properly address concerns several petitioners
have regarding GTE's digital data service.

Opposing companies, including America Online Inc.,
argued that the DSL service, which is supposed to
operate in 14 states, is in fact an intrastate service, and
therefore subject to state tariffs.

AOL and other petitioners claim that Internet service
providers (ISPs) are the real end-users of data line
services, not GTE's customers. This, they argue, would
make it stand to reason that ISPs using GTE's service
within GTE's 14- state would make GTE liable for local,
not federal taxes. According to GTE's opponents, 17
states currently view ISPs as end-users instead of the
ISP's customers.

GTE responded that the DSL service "is properly tariffed
at the federal level," and that "it is the nature of the
communication itself, rather than the location of the
technology, that determines the jurisdictional
classification of a service."

In its original filing, GTE also said that the DSL service
should be subjected to federal tariffs because Internet
access is primarily an interstate activity, because the line
will involve dedicated data transport and because DSL
conforms to an access service criterion under section
69.2 of the FCC's rules.

Petitioners Focal and ICG also argue that the GTE DSL
service only is offered to ISPs interconnected to GTE
wire centers, not to other telecommunications carriers.
Focal and ICG said that the DSL service only can be
classified as an access service if it offers access to
telephone exchange services.

GTE also is under fire from several competitors which
claim that the carrier has violated section 251 of the
Telecom Act, which states that incumbent local
exchange carriers (ILECs) "must offer for resale any
telecommunications service that the carrier provides at
retail to subscribers who are not telecommunications
carriers." ILECs also must provide access to its network
on an unbundled basis, as well as interconnection, to
any requesting telecommunications carriers.

By offering the DSL service as an exchange access
service only, claim petitioners E*Spire and Intermedia,
GTE will effectively remove DSL services in general from
being subject to section 251.

The FCC has instructed GTE to present a case for
keeping the status quo on its DSL service by September
3. Opponents must present their own positions before
September 14.

Reported by Newsbytes News Network:
newsbytes.com

(19980824/WIRES TELECOM, ONLINE, BUSINESS,
GOVT, LEGAL/)

<<Newsbytes -- 08-24-98>>

[Copyright 1998, NewsBytes]