Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Solv Ex (SOLVD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (5973)	8/25/1998 8:56:00 AM
From: David Coakley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6735

Jon- Millions of shares were purchased and delivered by brokerages in the form of naked shorts (i.e. demand was filled with make believe supply). Now that people are asking for delivery of their shares nobody can find any to deliver. There are between 5,000,000 and 9,000,000 shares sold short (NAKED) and only continued foul play will keep the lid from exploding off of this accident waiting to happen. This, incidentally, is where the SEC should be focusing its efforts. Enough criminal activity went into driving Solv-Ex into bankruptcy to keep Ken Starr busy for another 5 years. No I'm not referring to Rendall's or Campbell's activity.... Mark- Great post. Your assessment is why I continued adding to my position as the stock tanked. Why Solv-Ex was valued different from most any other related concern is simply because of the huge short position and their inability to cover at ANY price. Now what are they going to do?????????????????????????? Will the wonderful, hard-working, protectors of the public at the SEC be watching as the shorts try to weasel out of it again? David

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (5973)	12/6/2000 3:07:16 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6735

The kid, J Lebed, posted here too...400% in 2 weeks? <ggg> To: mqmsi who wrote (5972) From: Jonathan Lebed Monday, Aug 24, 1998 9:41 PM ET Reply # of 6721 I have been told by someone in contact with a major broker involved with SOLVQ, that there is a situation with the outstanding shares or something. I didn't understand completely what I was told...but from what I understand is that shares are in demand by brokers which aren't available, and I think that this should be favorable to the stock price. Is anybody familiar to what I am saying? Does this in any way make sense to anybody? If so, please help me out. Thanx, Jon of stock-dogs.com (we will release a new pick tomorrow at 3PM New York Time that should be good for a 2 week, 400% gain.)