Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Hyperion Solutions (HYSL) - An Analytical Gorilla? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trader Dave who wrote (89)	8/25/1998 9:48:00 AM
From: Exacctnt	Respond to of 471

Dave, HYSL chairman, Perkakis was on CNBC's squawk box this morning. Nothing spectacular was said. The focus of the questions was how the integration between the two companies will work out. Every little bit of exposure helps. Regards, Bob

To: Trader Dave who wrote (89)	8/25/1998 11:32:00 AM
From: Early Out	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 471

Woa, just bumped up to over 37, what was that all about? Whatever it was, I like it! -jsc

To: Trader Dave who wrote (89)	8/25/1998 12:05:00 PM
From: Reginald Middleton	Respond to of 471

<It is apparent that you use threads like this as a promotional tool for your company and its views. This type of promotionalism is not appreciated.> I don't think their is such a word as "promotionalism". You are also "apparent"ly (emphasis added) incorrect. I sell institutional wares and it is evident that most on this thread are not institutions. Simply because you do not agree with my stance is not just cause for you to throw stones. Others on this thread have (in my opinion, of course) succumbed to some popular myths concerning the market and how it acts and reacts. I simply supplied the information to give them an alternate viewpoint. Would you have made the same comment if the links pointed to a site other than one I was affiliated with? I have mounds academic theory, empirical data and circumstantial evidence to support my assertions, all of which I will freely reference if necessary. I feel that makes it credible enough to post to a thread if the topic at hand calls for it. Hey, if you don't want me to share my views on the thread, simply say so, but do not start to make things up.